Risk signal mining of ixazomib based on the database of FAERS / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To explore the risk signal of ixazomib and provide a reference for clinically rational drug use. METHODS The Open Vigil 2.1 online tool was used to extract the data of adverse drug events （ADE） reported by the database of FDA adverse event reporting system （FAERS） from the launch of ixazomib in America （November 20th， 2015） to the latest update of the Open Vigil website （March 31st， 2023）. The data were mined by using the proportional reporting ratio （PRR） and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network （BCPNN） of the proportional imbalance method. The signals were coded by system organ class （SOC） and preferred term （PT） according to MedDRA v25.1. RESULTS A total of 13 841 ADE reports with ixazomib as the “primary subject” were extracted， involving slightly more male patients （49.53%）， and most of them were 65 years old and above （72.48%）； the reports came from 57 countries/regions， mainly America （52.90%）. A total of 186 positive signals were excavated， with 51 high-intensity， 99 medium-intensity， and 36 low-intensity signals， involving 19 SOCs. The top 50 PT in frequency and signal intensity of PRR included neuropathy peripheral （414 cases， high-intensity signal）， platelet count decreased （379 cases， high-intensity signal）， thrombocytopenia （360 cases， high-intensity signal）， cytopenia （75 cases， high-intensity signal） and neurological symptoms （41 cases， high-intensity signal）. SOC involved included nervous system disorders， investigations， and blood and lymphatic system disorders. ADE occurred most frequently in gastrointestinal diseases （2 588 cases）， including diarrhea （1 077 cases， high-intensity signal）， nausea （737 cases， medium-intensity signal）， vomiting （459 cases， medium-intensity signal）， constipation （275 cases， medium-intensity signal）， and so on. The positive signals of infections and infestations contained the largest number of PTs， and most of them were not recorded in the drug instruction， including 12 high-intensity signals （1 030 cases） and 30 medium-intensity signals （627 cases）， which were mainly distributed in lung infection， upper respiratory infection， gastrointestinal infection， sepsis， herpes zoster and so on. The signals of cardiac amyloidosis （7 cases， high-intensity signal） and acute coronary syndrome （14 cases， high-intensity signal） of cardiac disorders and renal dysfunction （91 cases， medium-intensity signal） of renal and urinary disorders were all strong and had not been recorded in the drug instruction. CONCLUSIONS In addition to routine attention to the common ADE of ixazomib in gastrointestinal diseases，nervous system disorders and blood and lymphatic system disorders， clinical attention should also be paid to various infections that may occur during the treatment of patients， and the occurrence of cardiovascular toxicity and renal dysfunction should be monitored.

Efficacy of total oral regimens containing ixazomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma / 中华内科杂志

To investigate the efficacy and safety of total oral regimen containing ixazomib in multidrug-resistant relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM). A total of 38 patients were retrospectively analyzed from August 2018 to January 2020 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The overall response rate (ORR)was 36.8%. Among them, the very good partial response (VGPR) or better rate was 23.7%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 5.3%. The ORR was 41.7% in patients receiving ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRD) regimen. Median PFS was 5 months and median OS was 7.5 months. The ORR was 50% after second-line therapy, 40% after third-line therapy and 12.5% after forth-line therapy or more. The ORR was 29.0% in bortezomib-refractory patients, 38.0% in lenalidomide-refractory patients, 21.4% in bortezmoib & lenalidomide dual refractory patients. Grade 3-4 hematological adverse events (AEs) were reported in 21% patients. Common hematological AEs included lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia. Other usual AEs were fatigue and diarrhea. No grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy was recorded. In the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with multidrug resistance, the total oral regimens containing ixazomib demonstrate reliable efficacy and safety. Early administration of ixazomib at first or second relapse is suggested for more favorable clinical outcome.

Clinical efficacy and safety of ixazomib-based therapy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma / 国际肿瘤学杂志

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ixazomib-based therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) .Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the efficacy and adverse reactions of 53 RRMM patients treated with a combined regimen containing ixazomib in the Hematology Department of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from July 8, 2018 to November 30, 2020. Among them, 6 patients received ID regimen (ixazomib + dexamethasone) , 30 patients received ID regimen + immunomodulator, and 17 patients received ID regimen + other chemotherapy drugs.Results:Fifty-three patients with RRMM received ixazomib-based therapy. The median previous treatment line was 3, the median treatment course was 6 (2-30) , and the median follow-up time was 21 months (2-32 months) . The overall response rate (ORR) was 54.7% (29/53) after 2 courses of treatment. Among them, 26.4% (14/53) had very good partial response (VGPR) and 28.3% (15/53) had partial response (PR) . The ORR of the ID regimen group, ID regimen + immunomodulator group and ID regimen + other chemotherapy group were 83.3% (5/6) , 56.7% (17/30) and 41.2% (7/17) respectively, with no statistically significant difference among the three groups ( P=0.208) . The median time to progression (TTP) of 53 patients was 8 months (1-24 months) . The most frequent adverse events of ixazomib treatment were gastrointestinal reactions such as nausea, vomit and diarrhea, with an incidence of 37.7% (20/53) , and the incidence of grade 3-4 was 5.7% (3/53) . The most common hematological adverse events were thrombocytopenia (15.1%, 8/53) , neutropenia (11.3%, 6/53) and anemia (9.4%, 5/53) . Grade 1-2 peripheral neurotoxicity occurred in only 7.5% (4/53) of patients. Conclusion:Ixazomib has good efficacy and safety for the patients with RRMM in the real world.

Efficacy and safety of ixazomib-based therapy for multiple myeloma / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of ixazomib-based therapy for multiple myeloma.Methods:The data of 32 patients with multiple myeloma treated with isazomib-based regimen in the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University from December 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among 32 patients, 17 cases were relapsed/refractory, and the remaining 15 cases had initial treatment. The treatment regimens included ID (isazomib + dexamethasone), IRD (isazomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone) and ICD (isazomib + cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone). The short-term curative effect and adverse reactions of relapsed/refractory patients and patients at initial onset were analyzed.Results:The overall response rate (ORR) of relapsed/refractory patients was 52.9% (9/17), of which 6 cases achieved complete remission (CR), 2 cases achieved very good partial remission (VGPR) and 1 case achieved partial remission (PR). The ORR of refractory patients receiving bortezomib therapy was 40.0% (4/10). The ORR of patients at initial onset who could be evaluated the curative effect was 100.0% (14/14), including 9 cases of CR, 2 cases of VGPR and 3 cases of PR. After treatment, 2 patients (6.2%) had grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ adverse events (1 case of herpes zoster and 1 case of thrombocytopenia), and none of the patients had grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ peripheral neuropathy.Conclusion:Isazomib is effective and safe in the treatment of initially treated and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Real world study of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in treatment of multiple myeloma / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) regimen in treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients in the real world practice.Methods:The clinical data of 24 MM patients treated with IRd regimen from January 2019 to January 2021 in the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology were retrospectively analyzed, and their efficacy and adverse reactions were analyzed. Among the 24 patients, 5 patients were relapsed and refractory (relapsed/refractory group), and 19 newly treated patients (conversion group) who responded to bortezomib induction therapy but converted to IRd regimen due to adverse reactions or other reasons.Results:The 24 patients were treated for a median of 4 cycles (2-7 cycles), with 8 cases of complete remission (CR), 6 cases of very good partial remission (VGPR), 8 cases of partial remission (PR), 1 case of disease progression (PD), 1 case of minimal response (MR), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 91.7% (22/24); the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 15 months (95% CI 6.6-23.4 months); 6 CR patients were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD). The common adverse reactions were hematological adverse reactions, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, gastrointestinal reactions, and infections. The incidence rate of grade 3-4 adverse reactions was 25.0% (6/24). In the relapsed/refractory group, the best efficacy was VGPR in 1 case, PR in 3 cases, and MR in 1 case, all patients withdrew from the IRd regimen therapy due to PD after transient remission or poor effect; in the conversion group, the best efficacy was CR in 8 cases, VGPR in 5 cases, PR in 5 cases, and PD in 1 case, 57.9% (11/19) patients maintained their original best response, and 36.8% (7/19) patients improved their best response to CR; the difference in median PFS time between the two groups was statistically significant (7 months vs. not reached, P = 0.018). Conclusions:The IRd regimen is safe and effective for MM patients, especially for the conversion patients after effective bortezomib induction therapy. Although patients with relapsed/refractory MM who have previously used multi-line therapy respond to IRd regimen, the duration of remission is limited.

Ixazomib-Based Regimen Followed by Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of POEMS Syndrome / 中国实验血液学杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the safety and efficacy of a new proteasome inhibitor Ixazomib followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in the treatment of POEMS syndrome.@*METHODS@#The clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment process and follow-up results of 4 patients with POEMS syndrome who were treated with Ixazomib-based regimen combined with AHSCT in Wuhan No.1 Hospital from February 2018 to July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were male, aged from 37-54 years old, with varying degrees of peripheral neuropathy, organ enlargement (liver, spleen or lymph nodes), circulatory overload (peripheral edema and/or pleural effusion), osteosclerosis, endocrine diseases (thyroid, gonads, etc.), skin changes (pigmentation, hemangioma, white nails, etc.), M protein, papilledema and other clinical manifestations and characteristics at the time of initial treatment. Two patients were pathologically diagnosed as hyaline vascular Castleman disease by lymph node biopsy. Three patients underwent lumbar puncture examinations and all showed elevated cerebrospinal fluid protein. All patients received at least 2 cycles of sequential AHSCT after induction chemotherapy based on ixazomib. The follow-up time was 10-28 months, and the median follow-up time was 16 months.@*RESULTS@#All cases survived. The complications were controllable during the treatment. Moreover, the clinical symptoms related to the disease were improved to a certain extent after the treatment. The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) showed a gradual decline.@*CONCLUSION@#Ixazomib combined with AHSCT is safe and effective in the treatment of POEMS syndrome.

Effects of in-class transition of proteasome inhibitors on curative efficacy and prognosis of newly-treated patients with multiple myeloma / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of in-class transition from proteasome inhibitor bortezomib to ixazomib in the treatment of newly-treated patients with multiple myeloma (MM).Methods:The clinical data of 63 newly-treated MM patients in Shenzhen Second People's Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into transition group (23 cases) and bortezomib group (40 cases). Both groups were treated with bortezomib-containing regimen as the first-line treatment regimen. In case of intolerable adverse reactions, patients in the transition group were treated with ixazomib instead of bortezomib, while the patients in the bortezomib group did not undergo drug transition. The curative effect and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups.Results:In the transition group, the overall response rate (ORR) before in-class transition was 95.7% (22/23), the rate of ≥ very good partial remission (VGPR) was 52.2% (12/23); the ORR after transition was 95.7% (22/23), and the rate of ≥ VGPR was 82.6% (19/23). In the bortezomib group, ORR was 90.0% (36/40), and the rate of ≥ VGPR was 72.5% (29/40). There was no significant difference in ORR and the rate of ≥VGPR between the two groups ( χ2 = 0.64, P=0.424; χ2 = 0.82, P = 0.364). The median number of cycles of PI therapy in the transition group was 9, and the median PFS time was not reached. The median number of cycles of PI therapy in the bortezomib group was 7.5, and the median PFS time was 30.0 months (95% CI 19.1-40.9 months), there was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups ( P = 0.275). In the bortezomib group, 12 patients discontinued bortezomib due to adverse reactions, the median PFS time was 20.0 months (95% CI 12.6-27.4 months), and the PFS of patients who discontinued PI in the transition group and the bortezomib group was compared, the difference was statistically significant ( P = 0.043). In the transition group, 21 patients (21/23, 91.3%) developed peripheral neuropathy, and the incidence of ≥grade 3 adverse reactions was 13.0% (3/23); in the bortezomib group, 22 patients (22/40, 55.0%) developed peripheral neuropathy, and the incidence of ≥grade 3 adverse reactions was 12.5% (5/40). Conclusions:For newly-treated MM patients, the transition from bortezomib to ixazomib can improve the depth of remission and reduce the recurrence caused by the discontinuation of PI.

Clinical study on ixazomib-based chemotherapy regimens in treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma / 白血病·淋巴瘤

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and related adverse reactions of ixazomib-based chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).Methods:Twenty-one patients with RRMM who received ≥2 courses of ixazomib-based chemotherapy regimens in Heze Municipal Hospital and Zoucheng People's Hospital of Shandong Province from October 2018 to February 2020 were collected. Among them, 15 patients had previously received the bortezomib-based regimens, 10 patients had received the lenalidomide-based regimens, and 6 patients had received the treatment regimens containing the above two drugs. The patients were treated by a two-drug or three-drug regimen: 4 mg ixazomib was taken orally on day 1, 8 and 15 in combination with other drugs (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide or lenalidomide). The therapeutic efficacy and safety were evaluated after the 2nd and the 4th treatment cycles.Results:The overall response rate (ORR) of 21 patients with RRMM after 2 treatment cycles was 38.09% (8/21), including 6 cases of partial remission (PR) and 2 cases of very good partial remission (VGPR). After 4 cycles, ORR was 57.14% (12/21), including 7 cases of PR, 4 cases of VGPR, and 1 case of complete remission (CR). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse reactions of the ixazomib-based chemotherapy regimens was 23.81% (5/21). Hematological adverse reactions included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia, and other common adverse reactions included the digestive tract reactions, fatigue, hypokalemia, etc., and the peripheral nerve adverse reactions were all grade 2 or below grade 2.Conclusion:The ixazomib-based chemotherapy regimens are effective and safe in treating RRMM.

Análise de custo por desfecho das novas terapias de combinação tripla com lenalidomida para o mieloma múltiplo recidivado/refratário no Brasil / Cost by outcomes analysis of novel triplecombination therapies with lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Brazil

Objetivo: Estimar o custo de tratamento das novas terapias de combinação tripla com lenalidomida no manejo dos pacientes com mieloma múltiplo recidivado/refratário (MMRR) sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde privado brasileiro. Métodos: Os custos associados da combinação de lenalidomida + dexametasona com carfilzomibe (KRd), daratumumabe (DRd), elotuzumabe (ERd) e ixazomibe (IRd) foram comparados. Para cada terapia, a duração de tratamento foi estimada pela média do tempo de sobrevida livre de progressão (SLP) restrita a três anos a partir de dados de SLP dos estudos pivotais das respectivas terapias. Os custos de tratamento foram estimados para a duração de tratamento, considerando a posologia específica dos regimes terapêuticos. Os preços dos medicamentos foram baseados no preço fábrica de abril de 2020. Não foi considerado o compartilhamento de doses. O custo total do tratamento, o custo médio por ciclo e o custo por taxa de resposta objetiva (TRO) em três anos foram comparados. Resultados: A duração de tratamento no período de três anos foi de 23,3, 27,6, 20,3 e 20,9 meses para KRd, DRd, ERd e IRd, respectivamente. O custo médio total de tratamento foi estimado em 975.557 reais (BRL) para KRd, 1.507.544 BRL para DRd (+55% versus KRd), 1.207.899 BRL para ERd (+24% versus KRd) e 983.917 para IRd (+1% versus KRd). KRd teve o menor custo médio por mês de SLP (horizonte de três anos) entre as terapias, 41.957 BRL versus 54.709 BRL para DRd (+30% versus KRd), 59.635 BRL para ERd (+42% versus KRd) e 47.147 para IRd (+12% versus KRd). Similarmente, o custo por TRO foi 31% menor para KRd (1.119.770 BRL), comparado ao DRd (1.621.015 BRL), 27% menor, comparado ao ERd (1.528.986 BRL), e 11% menor, comparado ao IRd (1.256.064). Conclusões: Resultados da presente análise indicam que KRd está associado a um menor custo médio de tratamento, acompanhado de maior previsibilidade, menor custo por TRO e por mês de SLP, comparado ao DRd, ERd e IRd no horizonte de três anos sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde privado brasileiro. Os resultados estão associados com alguma incerteza em razão das diferenças nas populações dos estudos, desenho dos estudos (duração fixa de carfilzomibe vs. tratamento até a progressão para daratumumabe, elotuzumabe e ixazomibe) e porque a duração de tratamento é tipicamente menor do que a SLP.

Objective: To estimate treatment costs for novel triple-combination therapies with lenalidomide in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients from the Brazilian private healthcare perspective. Methods: Treatment costs associated with lenalidomide + dexamethasone combinations with carfilzomib (KRd), daratumumab (DRd), elotuzumab (ERd) and ixazomib (IRd) were compared. For each therapy, treatment duration was estimated as the mean progression-free survival (PFS) time restricted to three years using published PFS data from pivotal trials available for these treatments. Treatment costs were estimated for the modeled treatment duration considering therapy-specific dosing schedules. Drug prices were based on April 2020 Brazilian list prices. No vial sharing was assumed. Total treatment costs, average cost per cycle, and cost per overall response rate (ORR) over the three-year period were compared. Results: Modeled treatment duration over the three-year period was 23.3, 27.6, 20.3 and 20.9 months for KRd, DRd, ERd and IRd respectively. Corresponding average total treatment costs were estimated to be 975,557 Brazilian Real (BRL) for KRd; 1,507,544 BRL for DRd (+55% versus KRd); 1,207,899 BRL for ERd (+24% versus KRd) and 983,917 for IRd (+1% versus KRd). KRd had the lowest average cost per month of restricted PFS (3-year time frame) among the therapies, 41,957 BRL versus 54,709 BRL for DRd (+30% versus KRd); 59,635 BRL for ERd (+42% versus KRd); and 47,147 for IRd (+12% versus KRd). Similarly, the cost per achieved ORR was lower for KRd (1,119,770 BRL) than that for DRd (1,621,015 BRL); ERd (1,528,986 BRL); and IRd (1,256,064) by 31%, 27% and 11%, respectively. Conclusions: Results of the present analysis indicate that KRd is associated with lower mean treatment costs and more predictable costs, lower cost per ORR and per month in PFS than DRd, ERd and IRd over a relevant three-year time horizon from the Brazilian private healthcare perspective. The results are associated with some uncertainty due to differences in trial populations, trial design (fixed duration for carfilzomib vs treatment till progression for daratumumab, elotuzumab and ixazomib) and because treatment duration is typically shorter than PFS.

New proteasome inhibitors in the treatment of multiple myeloma

Abstract The treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma has improved considerably in the last 15 years, after the introduction of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. The first clinical trials with new proteasome inhibitors have produced exciting results, particularly those comparing triplet regimens with standard doublet regimens, with a gain in progression-free survival accompanied by an acceptable safety profile and either similar or better health-related quality of life. New proteasome inhibitors hold the potential to fill unmet needs in multiple myeloma management regarding improvement of clinical outcomes, including delayed progression of disease in high-risk patients. This review summarizes the main pharmacological properties and clinical outcomes of these agents, and discusses their potential to change the whole multiple myeloma therapeutic landscape.

Cardiotoxicity evaluation of three novel proteasome inhibitors in zebrafish / 中国药科大学学报

@#To evaluate the cardiotoxicity of three novel proteasome inhibitors(NNU395, NNU458 and NNU459)in zebrafish, normal developmental zebrafish embryos at 6 hours post fertilization(hpf)were treated with different doses of NNU395 and NNU458 and NNU459 until 72 hpf, the zebrafish mortality was counted. Morphologic changes of the cardiovascular system were observed under a stereomicroscope, and the number of heart beats within 1 min was determined. The expression of cardiac development-related genes in zebrafish was detected by RT-qPCR(Quantitative Real-Time PCR). Results showed that NNU395, NNU458 and NNU459 increased the mortality of zebrafish in a concentration-dependent manner and the values of LC50(50% lethal concentration)were(179. 7±12. 2), (27. 5±1. 3)and(24. 4±2. 6)μmol/L, respectively. Moreover, the toxicity of our three compounds in zebrafish are less when compared with their modified precursors. Upon administration of NNU395 at the concentrations of 120- 200 μmol/L, and NNU458 or NNU459 at the concentration of 30 μmol/L, the zebrafish showed obvious pericardial edema cardiac malformation. 120- 200 μmol/L NNU395 and 0. 1- 30 μmol/L NNU458 or 10- 30 μmol/L NNU459 significantly reduced the heart rate of zebrafish. All of three compounds at the tested concentration had no significant effects on the expression of the heart development-related genes in zebrafish. Our results suggested that low concentrations of NNU395, NNU458 and NNU459 have no obvious toxicity on cardiac development of zebrafish. While, higher concentrations of them showed cardiovascular toxicity on zebrafish.

Custo-efetividade do esquema com daratumumabe, bortezomibe e dexametasona em comparação com terapias à base de carfilzomibe, elotuzumabe e ixazomibe para o tratamento de mieloma múltiplo recidivado e refratário na perspectiva de um pagador do sistema de saúde suplementar brasileiro / Cost-effectiveness analysis of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination in comparison to carfilzomib, elotuzumab and ixazomib-based therapies for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma from a Brazilian private payer perspective

Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo é estimar a razão de custo-efetividade incremental da combinação de daratumumabe, bortezomibe e dexametasona (DVd) em comparação com carfilzomibe com dexametasona (Kd); carfilzomibe, lenalidomida e dexametasona (KRd); elotuzumabe, lenalidomida e dexametasona (ERd); e ixazomibe, lenalidomida e dexametasona (IRd) no tratamento do mieloma múltiplo refratário ou recidivado (MMRR) sob a perspectiva de um pagador privado no Brasil. Métodos: Foi utilizado um modelo de transição com três estados, baseado no método de área sob a curva, para simular a trajetória de uma coorte com MMRR: pré-progressão, pós-progressão e morte. Parâmetros clínicos foram obtidos por meio de uma metanálise e os custos incluídos foram aquisição e administração de medicamentos e serviços médicos. O horizonte de tempo adotado foi de 30 anos e descontos de 5% foram aplicados tanto a custos quanto a desfechos de efetividade. Análise de sensibilidade probabilística foi realizada. Resultados: Demonstrou-se que o esquema terapêutico DVd é dominante sobre Kd, KRd, ERd e IRd. DVd gerou 1,09 ano de vida incremental versus Kd com economia de R$ 174.227; 0,15 ano de vida incremental com redução de R$ 238.324 em comparação com KRd; incremento de 0,06 ano de vida com redução de R$ 641.021 comparado com ERd; e 0,59 ano de vida incremental com economia de R$ 254.367 comparado com IRd. A análise de sensibilidade probabilística confirmou a consistência e a robustez do modelo e demonstrou que DVd tem probabilidades de 92,9%, 89,1%, 99,9% e 94,2% de ser custo-efetivo em comparação com Kd, KRd, ERd e IRd, respectivamente, assumindo um limiar de disposição a pagar de 3 PIB per capita. Conclusão: DVd demonstrou ser superior aos comparadores tanto em desfechos clínicos quanto econômicos no tratamento do MMRR, dados a maior sobrevida e os menores custos.

Objective: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) combination in comparison to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd); carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd); elotuzumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (ERd); and ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) for the treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) from a Brazilian private payer perspective. Methods: It was used a three-health state transition model based on the area under the curve method to simulate the cohort trajectory: pre-progression, post-progression, and death. Clinical parameters were obtained in a meta-analysis and considered costs were: drugs acquisition and administration, and medical services. Time-horizon was 30 years, and discount rates applied to costs and outcomes were 5%. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of the uncertainty of the input values. Results: The analysis demonstrated that DVd treatment is dominant over Kd, KRd, ERd, and IRd, providing an increment of 1.09 life year with cost reduction of R$174.227 when compared to Kd, an increment of 0,15 life year with cost reduction of R$238.324 when compared to KRd, an increment of 0,06 life year with cost reduction of R$641.021 when compared to ERd, and an increment of 0,59 life year with cost reduction of R$254.367 when compared to IRd. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of the model and results consistency, demonstrating that DVd has 92.9%, 89.1%, 99.9%, and 94,2% probability of being cost-effective versus Kd, KRd, Erd, and IRd, respectively, when an ICER of 3 per-capita GDP is assumed. Conclusion: DVd combination demonstrated superior clinical and economic outcomes in RRMM patients when compared to Kd, KRd, Erd, and IRd, since the therapy provides longer survival to patients at a lower cost to payers.